This is because they have a defective disgust mechanism compared to conservatives. I’m looking at you, black people. I know that you are Democrat more than you are liberal. You don’t abide nasty ass shit like this.
But this is who white people associate you with. White people think that you are nasty because you vote with nasty ass degenerate white women who don’t see any problem with carrying around a hot bottle of piss, just in case they run across someone to pour it on (or if they get kind of thirsty.)
This nasty ho went out, found a bottle, pissed in it, and then carried it around… just in case.
And she always votes Democrat.
So, you have 8000 military aged men, investing a fortification, before breaching that fortification with a battering ram…
but whatever you do, don’t call it an invasion.
Putting it on the record now — In October 2016, Israel will release all of Hillary Clinton’s Secretary of State emails (after redacting the ones damaging to Israeli security.)
So now the Feds Want to Lower Legal Driving Limit to .05%. It’s already at .08%. It used to be at 0.1%. When we lowered it from 0.1 to 0.08, fatalities due to alcohol actually increased. Why?
Because cops can’t tell that you are drunk at 0.08 without a breathalyzer. It doesn’t effect your driving enough to be able to tell. At 0.1, cops find drunks by driving their beats and pulling over people weaving around and blowing stop signs like a drunk. People at 0.08 don’t do those things, so you can’t catch them that way.
So, what did the cops do? They start setting up roadblocks. They take tons of cops off the street, and put them all in one place. That one place, BTW, is one that is ridiculously easy to see ahead of time and avoid. So, they aren’t getting any real drunks at the road block, and they aren’t out on the street looking for the drunks. (The point of a roadblock is to let them come to you.) And even then, they are screwing up traffic for everyone else (who is going to get rear ended if a drunk does show up to the roadblock.)
Now, the NTSB wants to arrest people who are impossible to detect without a still-questionable technology in a quest to try to create more statistics based crimes.
If you’d like to protect your daughter, raise her in such a way that she can protect herself. Give her the tools to decipher a dangerous situation. Teach her the language of consent and how to exit a situation that makes her uncomfortable. Help her be confident about her decisions, and show her how to make good choices about the people she spends time with. Take the time and be involved in her life. Protect your son in the same ways. And, for goodness sake, if you have good reason to distrust their judgement, make sure their activities are safe and monitored.
This is rape culture, straight up.
What she is really saying is that when her son coerces and cajoles a girl into having sex with him when she really doesn’t want to, it’s the girl’s fault, and that she should “make good choices” instead of being raped. Because, after all, her son is a member of the patriarchy, and he should be allowed to have sex with any girl he wants, whether she wants it or not. And if she has her father create a safe space for her to do that in, that some how injures her son’s privilege to invade any vagina he wants.