Fisking of the Day

Bush’s War Goes Global

The Marriott Hotel in Jakarta was still burning when Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, Indonesia’s Co-ordinating Minister for Political and Security Affairs, explained the implications of the day’s attack.

“Those who criticize about human rights being breached must understand that all the bombing victims are more important than any human-rights issue.”

In a sentence, we got the best summary yet of the philosophy underlying President George W. Bush’s so-called war on terrorism. Terrorism doesn’t just blow up buildings; it blasts every other issue off the political map. The specter of terrorism, real and exaggerated, has become a shield of impunity, protecting governments around the world from scrutiny for their human-rights abuses.

This is a false dillemma. First, it isn’t even the White House saying this — it is Indonesia. (I guess that is the best she could come up with.) Second, nothing in it says that you have to choose one or the other. It doesn’t even say that they should be protected from scrutiny, just that in the final evaluation, keeping people alive is more important than making sure terrorists get skim milk instead of whole milk in Gitmo.

Many have argued that the WoTtm is the U.S. government’s thinly veiled excuse for constructing a classic empire, in the model of Rome or Britain. Two years into the crusade, it’s clear that this is a mistake: The Bush gang doesn’t have the stick-to-it-ness to successfully occupy one country, let alone a dozen.

Hey, dimwit, we are occupying two countries right this second — Afghanistan and Iraq. The list could really be much higher, since we are also still occupying Japan, Germany, Korea, and semi-occupying Kuwait to provide security.

Mr. Bush and the gang do, however, have the hustle of good marketers, and they know how to contract out. What Mr. Bush has created in the war on terrorism is less a doctrine for world domination than an easy-to-assemble tool kit for any mini-empire looking to get rid of the opposition and expand its power.

The war on terrorism was never a war in the traditional sense, it lacked a clear target or a fixed location. It is, instead, a kind of brand, an idea that can be easily franchised by any government in the market for an all-purpose opposition cleanser.

We already know that the WoTtm works on domestic groups that use terrorist tactics, such as Hamas or the Armed Revolutionary Forces of Colombia (FARC). That’s only its most basic application. WoTtm can be used on any liberation or opposition movement. It can be applied liberally to unwanted immigrants, pesky human-rights activists and even on hard-to-get-out investigative journalists.

Domestic groups that use terrorist tactics. Hey, shithead, you know what we call that in the real world? They are called TERRORISTS. That what you are called when you use “terrorist tactics.”

It was Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon who was the first to adopt Mr. Bush’s franchise, parroting the White House’s pledges to “pull up these wild plants by the root, smash their infrastructure” as he sent bulldozers into the occupied territories to uproot olive trees, and tanks to raze civilian homes.

Soon enough, Mr. Sharon’s wild plants included human-rights observers who were bearing witness to the attacks, as well as aid workers and journalists.

They weren’t “observers”. They were “interferers”. Observers don’t need bullhorns. Observers observe from the side. If you are observing from the side, you can’t be run over by something in the middle.

Another franchise soon opened in Spain with Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar extending his WoTtm from the Basque guerrilla group ETA to the Basque separatist movement as a whole, the vast majority of which is peaceful. Mr. Aznar has resisted calls to negotiate with the Basque Autonomous Government and banned the political party Batasuna (even though, as The New York Times noted in June, “no direct link has been established between Batasuna and terrorist acts”). He has also shut down Basque human-rights groups, magazines and the only entirely Basque-language newspaper. In February, the Spanish police raided the Association of Basque Middle Schools, accusing it of having terrorist ties.

This appears to be the true message of Mr. Bush’s war franchise: Why negotiate with your political opponents when you can annihilate them? In the era of WoTtm, little concerns like war crimes and human rights just don’t register.

Try this one on for size asshole. “Why negotiate with terrorists when they will simply break the cease-fire anyways?” That is what your beloved Palestinian child murderers have taught the world. Terrorists, by their nature, cannot be negotiated with. To do so simply validates the tactic.

Among those who have taken careful note of the new rules is Georgia’s President Eduard Shevardnadze. In October, while extraditing five Chechens to Russia (without due process) for its WoTtm, he stated that “international human-rights commitments might become pale in comparison with the importance of the anti-terrorist campaign.”

First, what exactly is “due process” in Georgia? I’m betting it isn’t the same as in the US. Second, Chechnyans… I’ve heard that name before. Oh, that’s right — they are the ones blowing up apartment buildings and taking entire theaters hostage. Lovely fellows. Why would anyone be upset with them?

Indonesia’s President Megawati Sukarnoputri got the same memo. She came to power pledging to clean up the notoriously corrupt and brutal military and to bring peace to the fractious country. Instead she has called off talks with the Free Aceh Movement and in May, invaded the province, the largest military offensive since the 1975 invasion of East Timor. The Indonesian human-rights organization Tapol describes the situation in the oil-rich province as “a living hell, a daily roundup of trauma and extreme fear, of sweeping villages, of the seizure of people at random and, hours later, their bodies left lying by the roadside.”

Why did the Indonesian government think it could get away with the invasion after the international outrage that forced it out of East Timor? Easy: Post-Sept. 11, the government cast Aceh’s movement for national liberation as “terrorist,” which means human-rights concerns no longer apply. Rizal Mallarangeng, a senior adviser to Megawati, called it the “blessing of Sept. 11.”

It was hard to vet this quote; I finally found it and caught the Dowdism:

“This is a blessing of Sept. 11 — that we now know terrorism has two sources, God and nation,” said Rizal Mallarangeng, the adviser.

So which it? Are you an ignorant shit who didn’t know what he actually said, or a lying shit who decided to twist the words to mean what you need at the moment? It means that terrorists aren’t always religious fanatics. Sometimes they are nationalists, you simple-minded myrmidon.

Philippines President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo appears to feel similarly blessed. Quick to cast her battle against Islamic separatists in the southern Moro region as part of WoTtm, Ms. Arroyo — like Mr. Sharon, Mr. Aznar and Megawati — abandoned peace negotiations and waged brutal civil war instead, displacing 90,000 people last year.

She didn’t stop there. Last August, speaking to soldiers at a military academy, Ms. Arroyo extended the war beyond terrorists and armed separatists to include “those who terrorize factories that provide jobs,” code for trade unions. Labor groups in Philippine free-trade zones report that union organizers are facing increased threats, and strikes are being broken up with extreme police violence.

Where’s your weasel language now? Shouldn’t that be “trade unions that use terrorist tactics”?

In Colombia, the government’s war against leftist guerrillas has long been used as cover to murder anyone with leftist ties, whether union activists or indigenous farmers. But even in Colombia, things have gotten worse since President Alvaro Uribe took office in August, 2002, on a WoTtm platform.

Last year, 150 union activists were murdered. Like Mr. Sharon, Mr. Uribe quickly moved to get rid of the witnesses, expelling foreign observers and playing down the importance of human rights. Only after “terrorist networks are dismantled . . . will we see full compliance with human rights,” Mr. Uribe said in March.

It is worth noting here that the “observers” mentioned here are the same ilk as the “observers” in Israel.

Sometimes WoTtm is not an excuse to wage a war, but to keep one going. Mexican President Vicente Fox came to power in 2000 pledging to settle the Zapatista conflict “in 15 minutes” and to tackle rampant human-rights abuses committed by the military and police. Now, post-Sept. 11, Mr. Fox has abandoned both projects. The Mexican government has made no moves to reinitiate the Zapatista peace process and last week, Mr. Fox closed down the high-profile office of the Undersecretary of Human Rights.

The talks were called off because the Zapatistas wouldn’t negotiate. No point in talking just to hear your own voice. As for sacking the Undersecretary, I’m all for removing redundant layers of bureaucracy.

This is the era ushered in by Sept. 11, war and repression unleashed not by a single empire, but a global franchise of them. In Indonesia, Israel, Spain, Colombia, the Philippines and China, governments have latched onto to Mr. Bush’s deadly WoTtm and are using it to erase their opponents and tighten their grip on power.

Last week, another war was in the news. In Argentina, the senate voted to repeal two laws that granted immunity to the sadistic criminals of the 1976-1983 dictatorship. At the time, the generals called their campaign of extermination a “war on terror,” using a series of kidnappings and violent attacks by leftist groups as an excuse to seize power.

The vast majority of the 30,000 people who were disappeared during the dictatorship weren’t terrorists; they were union leaders, artists, teachers, psychiatrists. As with all wars on terrorism, terrorism wasn’t the target — it was the excuse to wage the real war on people who dared to dissent.

Okey-dokey. What the hell does that have to do with the price of eggs? That’s the best you can come up with, huh? Okay, I can dig this logic. It follows logically that since one instance of wrongdoing is enough to demonize a whole philosophy, I’ll point to Stalin’s purges and condemn socialism.

Unfortunately for you, I have more than just that one example to support my position.

2 Comments

  1. Susie says:

    Did you point out the one good thing about the article? It shows we aren’t the only country in the world fighting terrorism, thank goodness!

  2. Carnival of the Inanities

    It’s my weekend! Yay! Time to see what good stuff I have missed while I was slaving over a hot projector and flinging popcorn at annoying urchins… The Everlasting Phelps eloquently fisks an article that decries the “franchising” of President…